Yuandian

Overview

Yuandian Think Tank is a one-stop legal knowledge service platform for legal professionals such as lawyers, corporate counsel, law faculty and students, judges, and prosecutors. It contains over 4 million legal and regulatory documents, more than 150 million publicly available court judgments, and provides resources including corporate registration information and contract templates. As an intelligent legal database and retrieval system, it offers efficient and convenient search services through legal knowledge search and recommendation.

The platform leverages powerful natural language processing and semantic understanding technologies to support element-based search, similar case recommendation, and analysis of judges and lawyers, helping users quickly locate key information. Through multi-dimensional data correlation and visualization, users can deeply explore adjudication trends, judicial viewpoints, and corporate risks.

Yuandian Think Tank also integrates specialized tools such as corporate analysis, patent and trademark search, and case study, covering all scenarios of legal work. Whether it is daily legal research, litigation strategy development, or commercial compliance due diligence, it provides accurate and reliable data support.

Core capabilities

Similar case search

Intelligently matches and recommends similar cases based on massive court judgments

Legal regulation lookup

Contains over 60,000 national laws, department rules, and local regulations

Corporate analysis

One-click access to business registration information, litigation records, and operational risks

Judgment data analysis

Visualizes judges' ruling tendencies and lawyers' representation characteristics

Contract templates

Provides 3,565 templates across categories such as maritime and loan contracts

Smart search

Supports natural language input and returns the most relevant results in real time

Use cases

Lawyers search similar cases to prepare defense strategies

Corporate counsel quickly look up relevant regulations during contract review

Law professors use judgment data to write empirical research papers

Judges refer to similar case rulings during trial proceedings

Prosecutors use corporate analysis tools to investigate the background of involved entities

Law students search for legal authorities in moot court

Legal assistants quickly generate similar case search reports